Skip to main content

NetBrain AI Governance Practice

  • June 1, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 32 views
A
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi NetBrain Team,

While we embrace the agentic AI capability brought by NetBrain, I am wondering if NetBrain complies to any AI standards such as ISO 42001 and ISO 42005 as below:

ISO/IEC 42001 - The world’s first AI management system standard, providing valuable guidance for this rapidly changing field of technology. It addresses the unique challenges AI poses, such as ethical considerations, transparency, and continuous learning. For organizations, it sets out a structured way to manage risks and opportunities associated with AI, balancing innovation with governance.

ISO/IEC 42005 - AI technologies are rapidly reshaping industries, economies and daily life — offering immense benefits, but also raising ethical, social and environmental concerns. ISO/IEC 42005 plays a crucial role in ensuring these impacts are responsibly addressed. By guiding organisations through structured impact assessments, it enables them to align AI development with values such as fairness, safety, and human-centred design. It also supports broader governance and risk management practices, reinforcing trust and societal acceptance of AI systems.

More AI standards could be available here:

https://www.iso.org/sectors/it-technologies/ai

 

Appreciated if you could share the thoughts.

Regards,

Andong 

2 replies

S
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Sahilkatira
  • NetBrain Employee
  • June 30, 2026

Hi Andong,

AI governance is something we take seriously. A useful starting point: ISO/IEC 42001 and ISO/IEC 42005 are written for organizations and how they manage AI, not for individual software products. 42001 sets out requirements for an AI management system, and 42005 provides guidance for assessing an AI system's impact. So in practice the useful question is less "is the product certified" and more "how does a given AI capability fit into your organization's AI management program."

Separately, responsible AI is core to how NetBrain designs its agentic capabilities. Humans stay in control of any consequential action, and outputs are grounded in your real-time digital twin and your actual network state rather than generated in isolation.

For the specifics you're asking about, including exactly how NetBrain maps to ISO/IEC 42001 and 42005 and where NetBrain stands on these standards, I'd rather connect you with the right people than paraphrase them. Our security and compliance team are the right source for that detail, and your NetBrain account team can share our current AI architecture and security documentation. If you'd like, I can help set that up.

Appreciate you raising it, and happy to keep the conversation going here as well.

Best regards,
Sahil
TME, Netbrain

 

 

 

 

    A
    Forum|alt.badge.img
    • andongl
    • Author
    • New Participant
    • July 1, 2026

    Hi Sahil,

    Thanks a lot for the update and providing the detail information.

    Yes you are right ISO/IEC 42001 is not a product certificate, similar to ISO 9001 or ISO 27001, it’s a certificate for organizations which develop, deploy or use the AI systems. I trust NetBrain has put similar policies or controls for this.

    From integration partners and customers’ perspective, I believe a few things remain as key concerns:

    • Human Oversight - I believe this has been addressed by NetBrain to put human in control
    • Privacy and Security - While NetBain leverages OpenAI, Gemini or ChatGPT for their AI capabilities, is there a mechanism to prevent customers’ sensitive data like configurations, network topologies etc. to be shared openly and used for LLM trainings? is the production dataset shared with AI LLMs processed with de-identification?

    It will be appreciated if you could share a bit insight about privacy and security control, so we could communicate with customer and address their concern properly.

    Best Regards,

    Andong 

    Follow NetBrain on LinkedIn

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement