Some of the hardest compliance gaps are not caused by missing policies, but by outdated, incomplete, or after-the-fact evidence. For financial IT teams, that creates risk across resilience testing, third-party ICT oversight, and incident documentation, all of which depend on records that reflect the live network, not last quarter’s snapshot.
These gaps often show up in three areas:
Resilience Testing
Testing needs to be designed against the actual production environment. Static diagrams and manual topology snapshots can quickly become stale when changes happen across the network.
Third-Party ICT Risk
Cloud circuits, ISPs, and colocation environments all support critical services. They need continuous visibility, not periodic checks or disconnected vendor documentation.
Incident Evidence
Incident timelines, diagnostic actions, and root-cause details should be captured as the response unfolds. Evidence rebuilt after the incident rarely tells the full story.
NetBrain shows how automation supports governed, evidenced change, including credential audit and rotation workflows with a 99.97% time reduction and 100% change success rate.
Download the DORA Compliance Brief: https://www.netbrain.com/resources/dora-compliance-pdf/
💬 Where do you see the biggest evidence gap today: resilience testing, third-party visibility, or incident documentation?
